What`s the Definition of Mutiny

Mutiny comes from an old verb, mutiny, which means “revolt,” and a mutiny is always like a revolt. It can be a group of people, as during the famous mutiny on the Bounty in 1789, when the crew of a British Royal Navy ship threw the captain out so they could stay in Tahiti. (It`s definitely worth it.) A mutiny does not need to be at sea or in the army; Perhaps it is “rejecting the order of the authority figure,” in other words, every teacher`s nightmare. Mutiny was considered the most serious crime, especially on board ships at sea. Since it was assumed that the safety of the vessel depended on the submission of all persons on board to the master`s will, the captain was given extensive disciplinary powers, including the power to impose the death penalty without a court martial. However, with the development of radio communications, these harsh penalties have become less necessary and, according to many current military codes, sentences for mutiny can only be imposed by court martial. During the Age of Discovery, mutiny meant above all an open rebellion against the captain of a ship. This happened, for example, during Ferdinand Magellan`s travels around the world, which led to the murder of one mutineer, the execution of another and the arrest of others; Henry Hudson`s Discovery, which trained Hudson and others to float in a boat; and the infamous mutiny on the Bounty. Mutiny means any overt act of resistance or attack against military (including naval) authority by two or more persons subject to that authority.

The term is sometimes used to describe non-military cases of resistance or attack – such as mutiny aboard a merchant ship or a slave uprising in a state where slavery is recognized by law or custom. Mutiny must be distinguished from revolt or rebellion, which involve broader resistance and usually have a political purpose. Those convicted of mutiny often faced the death penalty. Somehow, he managed to persuade the crew to join him in the mutiny, and he left with piracy. U.S. military law requires obedience only to lawful orders. Disobedience to illegal orders (see Supreme Orders) is the obligation of every member of the U.S. military, a principle established by the Prague and Tokyo trials after World War II and reaffirmed after the My Lai massacre during the Vietnam War. However, a U.S. soldier who disobeys an order after declaring it illegal will almost certainly be court-martialed to determine whether the disobedience was appropriate. Moreover, the mere refusal of obedience is not a mutiny that requires cooperation or conspiracy to disobey.

Rebellion, revolution, insurrection, revolt, insurrection, mutiny mean an explosion against authority. Rebellion involves open and formidable resistance, often unsuccessful. Open rebellion against the officers` revolution refers to a successful rebellion that leads to great change (as in government). A political revolution that overthrew the monarchy`s uprising involves a brief, limited, and often immediately ineffective rebellion. Revolt and insurrection involve an armed insurrection that fails or succeeds quickly. a revolt of the Young Turks that surprised the party leaders An uprising of suppressed workers` mutiny applies to rebellion or group insurrection, especially against naval authority. A mutiny led by the ship`s cook The same definition applies to the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force. Until 1998, mutiny and another offence of non-oppression or denunciation of a mutiny were each punishable by death.

[2] Section 21(5) of the Human Rights Act 1998 completely abolished the death penalty in the United Kingdom. (Previously, the death penalty for murder had already been abolished, but it had remained in force for certain military offences and treason, even though no executions had taken place for several decades.) This provision was not required by the European Convention on Human Rights, since Protocol No. 6 to the Convention allowed the death penalty in time of war and Protocol No. 6. Article 13, which prohibits the death penalty in all circumstances, did not exist at the time. The UK Government introduced Article 21(5) as a belated amendment in response to parliamentary pressure. The United States Uniform Code of Military Justice defines mutiny as follows: within three months, one of the original six members of the council was charged with mutiny and executed. Until 1689, mutiny in England was regulated by articles of war introduced by the monarch and was only effective in wartime.

In 1689, the first Mutiny Act was passed, transferring responsibility for the enforcement of discipline within the army to parliament. The Mutiny Act, amended in 1803, and the Articles of War defined the modalities and penalties for mutiny until they were replaced by the Army Discipline and Regulation Act in 1879. This in turn was replaced by the Army Act in 1881. News of this alleged mutiny spread quickly and large crowds rushed to see the case. The real Boone narrowly survived a player mutiny in 1977, when the football team threatened to resign if he did not apologize for a particularly vicious tirade after a loss. A mutiny is a rebellion against authority, such as when sailors run over the captain of a ship or when a class of Grade 8 students refuses to dissect a frog in biology class. He left, but many other mercenaries remained, and two years later they were executed or expelled after a mutiny in Stanleyville. He faced a near-mutiny in his own party, which many thought was going too far.

He risked a mutiny, but nevertheless turned six senior park officials over to the park`s resource trading courts. Upon his arrival in Rome to take his new command, he faced a mutiny. Today, the Army Act of 1955 defines mutiny as:[1] The Mutinies Act of 1803 brought about a major constitutional change in this regard: the Crown`s power to enact articles of war became entirely legal and the prerogative was incorporated into the Act of Parliament. The Mutinies Act of 1873 was passed in this way. At the same time, another remarkable change took place. The Mutinies Act had only come into force for one year at a time, according to constitutional theory: Thus, the history of English military law up to 1879 can be divided into three periods, each with its own constitutional aspect: (I) before 1689, the army, which was regarded as personal supporters of the sovereign and not as servants of the state, was governed primarily by the will of the sovereign; (2) Between 1689 and 1803, the army, recognized as a permanent force, was governed within the empire by law and without it by the prerogative of the crown, and (3) from 1803 to 1879 it was governed either directly by law or by the sovereign by virtue of an authority derived from the law and defined and limited by it.